Entry #13725: LGBT discrimination in United States

Current Version

RegionUnited States
IssueLGBT discrimination
StatusVaries by Region
Start DateJun 26, 2015
End Date(none)
DescriptionFederally, there is no protections against LGBTQ+ discrimination with the exception of employment under the 2020 Bostock decision. States have varying protections against LGBTQ+ discrimination. Cities and counties across the country have enacted various non-discrimination ordinances with the exception of Arkansas and Tennessee where such ordinances are illegal.
Sourceshttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/644/
https://web.archive.org/web/20160610201120/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf


Revision History (3)

edited by mineszilla. better summed info

Helpful?
0
Old Value New Value (Current)
DescriptionObergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. Tennessee has laws for LGBTQ discrimination, thus being varies by region even though its federally protectedFederally, there is no protections against LGBTQ+ discrimination with the exception of employment under the 2020 Bostock decision. States have varying protections against LGBTQ+ discrimination. Cities and counties across the country have enacted various non-discrimination ordinances with the exception of Arkansas and Tennessee where such ordinances are illegal.
Show Difference
Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. Tennessee has laws for LGBTQ discrimination, thus being varies by region even though its federally protected Federally, there is no protections against LGBTQ+ discrimination with the exception of employment under the 2020 Bostock decision. States have varying protections against LGBTQ+ discrimination. Cities and counties across the country have enacted various non-discrimination ordinances with the exception of Arkansas and Tennessee where such ordinances are illegal.

edited by qcksws. Added desc and fixed status

Helpful?
0
Old Value (Original) New Value
ValueIllegal in some contexts(REMOVED)
Special StatusIllegal in some contextsVaries by Region
DescriptionObergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees.Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. Tennessee has laws for LGBTQ discrimination, thus being varies by region even though its federally protected
Show Difference
Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees. Tennessee has laws for LGBTQ discrimination, thus being varies by region even though its federally protected

created by qcksws

Helpful?
0
Original entry
StatusIllegal in some contexts
Start DateJun 26, 2015
End Date(none)
DescriptionObergefell v. Hodges, 2015 court case allows same-sex marriages. This also protects LGBTQ discrimination. Bostock v. Clayton County, GA protects LGBTQ employees.
Sourceshttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/644/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160610201120/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/17-1618_hfci.pdf